Abstract:
The globalization of business implies global and straightforward legal solutions to various aspects of activities of multinational companies. This paper discusses the global regulation of one such aspect — proceedings against multinationals in economic distress. The research provides a background of international, regional and domestic aspects of a cross-border insolvency framework. The paper focuses on one particular element in cross-border insolvency proceedings — international tax claims. In certain jurisdictions, foreign tax claims are unenforceable in the absence of respective international treaties, which might pose certain obstacles to the development of cross-border insolvency law. An implied solution is the expansion of treaty networks for mutual recognition of tax claims, which might be a more complicated solution than the removal of restrictions in domestic legal acts. Armenia, a developing economy, is among the states, which are hesitant about shifting to a modified universalist regime of regulation of cross-border insolvency proceedings. Covering the specific case of the Armenian insolvency law, this paper will help get an insight into some aspects of cross-border insolvency law and analyze the necessity for the Armenian insolvency legislation to incorporate “modified universalist” cross-border insolvency rules in line with the international practice.