dc.description.abstract |
The aim of this research study is to investigate the impact of analytic
scoring rubrics on Armenian EFL learners’ speaking skills. It also investigates
whether the use of rubrics promotes inter-rater reliability in assessment of
speaking. Besides, it explores Armenian EFL learners’ attitude towards the
use of rubrics for teaching and assessment processes.
The study was conducted in the Experimental English Classes (EEC)
of the Department of English Programs (DEP) at the American University of
Armenia (AUA). The participants of the study were 19 EEC Communication
Leven 3 students. The study employed a quasi-experimental design and the
participants were grouped into two groups: experimental and control. The
experimental group received treatment; particularly the students used rubrics
for preparing oral assignments and received feedback based on rubrics. The
control group did not use rubrics for preparing their assignments and received
the traditional method of assessment.
The results of the study revealed that there is no impact of rubrics on
the improvement of Armenian EFL learners’ speaking skills. Besides, the
results showed that the students from the experimental group did not perform
better on their speaking assignments than the students from the control
group. However, the study displayed high inter-rater reliability of the scores of
two raters guided by analytic rubrics to assess students’ speaking skills. It
also showed the learners’ positive attitude towards the use of rubrics during
the course. |
en_US |