DSpace Repository

Resolving the concerns of treaty shopping in international investment law: is treaty shopping in international investment law a “legitimate nationality planning” or “treaty abuse”

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Avanessian, Aida
dc.contributor.author Tovmasyan, Gohar
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-22T11:21:46Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-22T11:21:46Z
dc.date.created 2020
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.aua.am/xmlui/handle/123456789/2074
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract Is treaty shopping in International investment law “legitimate nationality planning” or “treaty abuse”? This is the question investment arbitral tribunals have been increasingly facing in investment treaty arbitration. The need for an explicit dividing line between permissible nationality planning and abusive Treaty shopping became apparent a while ago, yet there is still no common consensus as to where to draw such line. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American University of Armenia en_US
dc.subject 2020 en_US
dc.subject AUA en_US
dc.subject American University of Armenia (AUA) en_US
dc.subject Investment law en_US
dc.subject Treaty shopping en_US
dc.subject Investments en_US
dc.subject International investment law en_US
dc.subject IIL en_US
dc.subject Bilateral Investment Treaty en_US
dc.subject BIT en_US
dc.subject Investor’s nationality en_US
dc.title Resolving the concerns of treaty shopping in international investment law: is treaty shopping in international investment law a “legitimate nationality planning” or “treaty abuse” en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account