DSpace Repository

Political marketing tools used in pre-election campaigns in Armenia: comparative analysis of 2013 presidential and 2017 parliamentary election campaigns

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Khachatryan, Knar
dc.contributor.author Tadevosyan, Azniv
dc.date.accessioned 2018-07-17T10:24:46Z
dc.date.available 2018-07-17T10:24:46Z
dc.date.created 2018
dc.date.issued 2018-07-17
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.aua.am/xmlui/handle/123456789/1557
dc.description This is a BA thesis work submitted to the American University of Armenia, Manoogian Simone College of Business and Economics, by Azniv Tadevosyan. en_US
dc.description.abstract The election campaigns in the Republic of Armenia have received little academic interest from the political marketing perspective, hence the aim of this capstone thesis to identify the political marketing tools and techniques that were used during the election campaigns, understand their effectiveness in transferring the political promise and to explore whether the change of the political system affected the usage of tools. For this purpose, the electoral campaigns of the Republican Party of Armenia (RPA) Serzh Sargsyan and Heritage Party candidate Raffi Hovhannisyan in 2013 presidential elections, as well as, after the constitutional change of the political context, of RPA and Tsarukyan bloc 2017 parliamentary elections are studies. The social media, video ads, booklets/flyers, election programs, campaign finances of each campaign were scrutinized as candidates’ channels of communication. Visual and written content analysis was carried out to interpret the above-mentioned data. For analyzing the media coverage and the social media environment of the campaigns, reports drafted by the Yerevan Press Club and Region Research Center were used. The two sets of case studies have revealed that the most popular political marketing tool throughout the studied campaigns was the leader image. Next in the row were the policy focus and the ideology. Increase in the usage of social media, reduction of broadcast media ad budget, diversification of political marketing channels and more trends have been identified. Not enough evidence was found to claim that the political system change influenced the campaigning behavior of the electioneers. It also showed that 66.7% of actual and communicated political products were corresponding, showing that the used political marketing tools were successful in transferring the ‘political promise’. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject 2018 en_US
dc.subject AUA en_US
dc.subject American University of Armenia (AUA) en_US
dc.subject Political marketing en_US
dc.subject Pre-election campaign en_US
dc.subject Political brand en_US
dc.subject Political marketing mix en_US
dc.subject Election campaign--Armenia en_US
dc.subject Armenian political market en_US
dc.title Political marketing tools used in pre-election campaigns in Armenia: comparative analysis of 2013 presidential and 2017 parliamentary election campaigns en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account