DSpace Repository

Defenses of states in investment arbitration: theoretical case study of Lydian International Ltd v. the Republic of Armenia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Avanessian, Aida
dc.contributor.author Amirkhanyan, Susanna
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-09T10:49:55Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-09T10:49:55Z
dc.date.created 2019
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri https://dspace.aua.am/xmlui/handle/123456789/2053
dc.description Thesis en_US
dc.description.abstract The problem question or subject matter of the present thesis paper is the examination of the possible defense mechanisms for the States in Investor-State Arbitration in general, and for the Republic of Armenia in Lydian International Ltd vs. Armenia hypothetical case, in particular. The choice of the subject matter is justified by the fact that the Dispute is still unset and in case Investor-State negotiations go wrong, problems will rise both for the State and the Investor itself. The practical significance of the paper lies in the fact that nowadays the number of the disputes between the investors and the state is not less all over the world and in Armenia as well. Moreover, the outcome of the Dispute will be essential for both foreign current and potential investors to consider whether or not to make further investments in Armenia. Hence, the paper will serve as a useful guideline for similar cases and situations for both Armenia and foreign investors. The paper aims to examine the possible mechanisms for the State to be utmost prepared to face the challenges in the investment arbitration, meanwhile saving its face in international investment climate for future and potential investors. To achieve the aim of the research the following objectives have been set forth: to envisage the potential claims to be raised by the Investor in Lydian International Ltd vs. Armenia hypothetical case; to present and analyse possible defense mechanisms for the States in Investor-State Arbitration in general; to examine possible defense mechanisms for the Republic of Armenia in Lydian International Ltd vs. Armenia hypothetical case in particular; to offer an insight on international best practices with regard to State defenses in Investor - Host State Arbitration; to discuss the strong and weak points and positions of both the State and the Investor; to come up with some general recommendations to manage and prepare for such Disputes in International Investment Arbitration. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American University of Armenia en_US
dc.subject AUA en_US
dc.subject 2019 en_US
dc.subject American University of Armenia (AUA) en_US
dc.subject Amulsar gold mine en_US
dc.subject Lydian Armenia OJSC en_US
dc.subject Mining companies en_US
dc.subject Environmental pollution en_US
dc.subject Investment arbitration en_US
dc.subject Investments en_US
dc.subject Protection of investment en_US
dc.subject Indirect expropriation of the investment en_US
dc.subject International investment law en_US
dc.title Defenses of states in investment arbitration: theoretical case study of Lydian International Ltd v. the Republic of Armenia en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account